Jump to content


Grammar Checker.


  • You cannot reply to this topic
3 replies to this topic

#1 pjfw

    Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 23 November 2003 - 09:10 AM

Not a simple request by any means, I know, but it would be great to have Spell Catcher work together with a grammar checker, as happened before Grammarian was sold.

#2 Evan Gross

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,986 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto, Canada
  • Interests:This Place!

Posted 23 November 2003 - 09:20 PM

pjfw, on Nov 23 2003, 10:10 AM, said:

Not a simple request by any means, I know, but it would be great to have Spell Catcher work together with a grammar checker, as happened before Grammarian was sold.
This was possible when both were published by the same company...

Any particular grammar checker you have in mind?

#3 skippingrock

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts

Posted 08 December 2003 - 03:18 PM

None in particular in mind, but if there was, I would want it to be not language specific. What I mean by that is, I would like the grammar checker to use the language dictionary of choice. For example if I am using the English UK dictionary or the English Canadian (when it comes out ;) I would like it to use those words other than the ones built into the grammar checker (which is usually English US).

Cheers and thanks.
Andrew.

PS eagerly awaiting the Canadian English Dictionary.

#4 Evan Gross

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,986 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto, Canada
  • Interests:This Place!

Posted 08 December 2003 - 06:13 PM

skippingrock, on Dec 8 2003, 03:18 PM, said:

None in particular in mind, but if there was, I would want it to be not language specific.  What I mean by that is, I would like the grammar checker to use the language dictionary of choice.  For example if I am using the English UK dictionary or the English Canadian (when it comes out ;) I would like it to use those words other than the ones built into the grammar checker (which is usually English US).

Cheers and thanks.
Andrew.

PS eagerly awaiting the Canadian English Dictionary.
Just so you know - any "dictionary" used by a Grammar checker would be totally separate from that used by a spelling checker.

Not just that, creating a grammar checker that works on variants of English may be possible, but one that works in various Roman languages would be next to impossible. You pretty much have to create a separate product for each different language. Each takes (say) 5-20 man-years to develop. So you'd be waiting quite some time for something to appear from scratch that worked in 5 or 6 different languages.

And then it probably wouldn't work as well as you wanted it to, anyway.

Such is the fate of grammar checkers. Very, very difficult things to get to work even reasonably well.